The Value of Identifying Great Residents

How Long-Term Renters Drive Profitability, Stability, and Property Value

Executive Summary

Finding and keeping high-quality residential residents is one of the most effective ways to protect and grow the value of your property portfolio. In a rental market where high resident turnover can quickly eat away at profits, properties that consistently secure long-term, reliable residents will have higher occupancy rates, more predictable cash flow, and reduced operating costs.

‍

These benefits extend beyond the bottom line. A good resident base fosters a positive reputation, which in turn attracts more good residents, creating a continuous cycle of quality and stability. In many cases, this stability can even extend to surrounding property values, because well-kept rentals enhance the appeal of the neighborhood and reduce vacancy rates across the board.

‍

There are considerable financial and operational benefits of securing great residents, including reduced vacancy rates, lower turnover expenses, and stronger long-term yields. Drawing on national statistics, regional examples, and modeled scenarios, it is possible to quantify how resident quality impacts profitability and outlines practical strategies for identifying and retaining the best renters and extending average multifamily lease beyond the 18‑month norm. 

The Resident Quality Challenge: A Competitive Rental Landscape

The U.S. rental market is vast: as of 2024, approximately 32–34 percent of all households rent their homes, representing between 102 and 109 million people (Apartment List). Yet despite these strong numbers, resident turnover remains a persistent challenge for property management companies.

‍

Nationally, the average American spends just 1.5 years in an apartment  (US Census), meaning that landlords may face the cost and disruption of replacing nearly two thirds of their resident base every 18 months. Beating this average is achievable - and it’s not just all about unit size and yard space, operational strategies play a big role in retention. Things like measurable service standards, predictable communications, and a proactive renewal playbook can all significantly reduce voluntary turnover.

‍

In this environment, the ability to identify and retain high-quality residents is not simply a customer service achievement. It is also a key financial strategy. Each additional year a resident stays can translate to thousands of dollars in preserved revenue and avoided expenses, while also reducing the uncertainty that comes with frequent changeovers.

Defining Good Residents: Beyond Paying on Time

In residential property management, good residents are defined by more than their ability to pay rent. They care for their units, follow lease terms, and - most critically - stay for multiple years. Industry benchmarks commonly define a long-term renter as one who remains in place for five years or more, while extreme long-term renters stay for 10 years or more.

‍

Recent data shows:

• 33.6% of renters nationwide meet the five-year benchmark, representing roughly 35 million households (Redfin).
• 16.6% have remained in the same rental for a decade or longer, totaling about 17 million households (New York Post).

These numbers are a little different for older renters, among baby boomers, 56% have rented the same unit for at least five years, and 34.1% for ten years or more (Redfin).

‍

From a landlord’s perspective, securing such residents is about more than reducing turnover frequency. These residents become embedded in their communities, often acting as informal ambassadors for the property and helping attract more renters like themselves.This chain reaction can also stabilize building culture, reduce complaint volume, and improve online reputation scores, which in turn lowers cost per lease for new traffic.

Why Resident Quality Matters: The Financial Impacts

Cutting the Cost of Every Move-Out

Every time a resident ends their lease, there is a cost to make the unit rent-ready for the next occupant. These costs typically include cleaning and repairs, marketing the vacancy, screening applicants, and covering the lost rent while the unit sits empty.

‍

According to the National Apartment Association, average turnover costs per unit, including lost rent, marketing, screening, and cleaning/repair expenses, range from $1,500 to $3,500 for typical U.S. properties (NAAHQ). 

‍

If we take that range, we can assume a mid-range for each turnover could be around $2,725 with a breakdown of $750 for cleaning and repairs, $300 for marketing, $175 for administrative and screening expenses, and one month of lost rent at roughly $1,500. The frequency of these costs depends directly on resident longevity. A short-term resident staying an average of 1.5 years generates turnover at a rate of about two-thirds of a move-out per year, equating to $1,816 in annual turnover expenses per unit. In contrast, a long-term resident staying an average of three years generates only one-third of a move-out per year, reducing annual turnover expense to roughly $908 per unit.

‍

For a 50-unit building, shifting from short-term to long-term residents could save more than $45,000 annually in turnover costs alone. That capital can be redirected toward property improvements or just straight owner profit. In smaller buildings, removing even two or three make‑readies per year often frees enough budget for amenity refreshes or curb‑appeal projects that further improve renewal rates.

Keeping Units Full and Revenue Flowing

Vacancy is one of the fastest ways to erode a property’s financial performance. A single dark unit in a 20‑unit building is a five percent revenue hit. Reducing voluntary move‑outs protects that revenue and lowers the marketing burden on onsite teams. For example, a unit renting at $1,500 per month at 90% occupancy generates $16,200 annually.

Why Stability Is Cheaper to Maintain

In apartments, churn itself is expensive. Each turn consumes staff time for vendor coordination, listing updates, showings, application processing, and post‑move inspections. Longer residency reduces these hidden operating burdens and shifts staff time toward preventative maintenance and resident experience, which further extends tenure. For a property collecting $500,000 in gross rent, even modest reductions in turn frequency can yield savings on the order of tens of thousands of dollars when you combine fewer make‑ready invoices, fewer marketing pushes, and lower concession exposure. For a property with $500,000 in gross revenue, that 15-point expense difference would be $75,000 in potential savings.

The Real Return on Renewal Retention

Long-term residents, with higher occupancy and lower turnover, exceed the net yields of short-term properties while offering greater predictability. Predictable cash flow also benefits valuations at sale or refinance because underwriters can model steadier rent rolls with fewer risk adjustments. A strong renewal process is critical to this equation. 

Good Residents Attract Good Residents

Having great residents builds a property’s reputation which is a marketing asset in its own right. Long-term residents are often invested in their communities, refer new renters, and contribute to a sense of security.

‍

Properties with visible stability — well-maintained common areas, familiar neighbors, and minimal turnover — send a strong signal to prospective residents that they’ve found a place worth staying in. Over time, this creates a self-reinforcing resident pipeline: satisfied renters become vocal advocates, and word-of-mouth referrals reduce the cost and effort of filling vacancies. For owners, this “invisible marketing” can be extremely beneficial. Reviews and reputation scores amplify the effect. Consistent five‑star feedback improves lead quality and reduces concession pressure during slower leasing periods.

‍

The 50-Unit Test: Long-Term vs. Short-Term ROI

To model the financial difference between “good residents” and “defaulters” within the same apartment building, we’ve combined the available data into this quick ROI example. 

Assumptions:

• Average monthly rent: $1,500 per unit
• Occupancy: 90% (well-run multifamily average, NAAHQ)
• Operating costs: 35% of gross revenue (NAAHQ)
• Average turnover cost: $2,725 per unit per event, including lost rent, marketing, screening, and repairs (NAAHQ)
• Turnover frequency: Quality resident = 1 turn every 3 years ($908.33/year); High-churn unit = 1 turn every 1.5 years ($1,816/year)

Modeled Outcome:

• 50 units with quality residents: $11,438.33 net per unit/year → $571,916.50 total
• 50 units with high turnover: $7,020 net per unit/year → $351,000 total

Annual Difference: +$220,916.50 more net income for the same property when residents stay longer.

Where the savings come from: The gap is driven by fewer turnover events, meaning less lost rent, fewer marketing pushes, reduced screening/admin time, and lower repair costs. These operational savings directly lift net operating income without raising rents. 

Over a decade, that would compound to more than $2.2 million in additional net income for the same property, simply by prioritizing resident quality.

How to Attract and Keep the Best Residents

1. Screen for “positives” rigorously and consistently

Use income verification, employment verification, rental history, and reference calls to confirm financial stability and responsible behavior. Applying the same screening standards for all applicants ensures fairness and compliance with housing laws. Consistent screening also creates a clear, defendable process should a dispute arise, protecting landlords legally as well as financially.

‍

2. Stay “guest ready” 

Long‑term residents are drawn to properties that feel move‑in ready the instant they tour. In multifamily, this starts with spotless units and functional finishes, but it extends to hallways, elevators, mailrooms, and amenities. Treat every day like an open house so prospects experience the building at its best. First impressions happen in seconds.

3. Build a Strong Renewal Process

Start early. Begin renewal conversations 90 to 120 days before lease-end. Pair with value added offers like small but visible upgrades–paint refreshes or lighting improvements. Make paperwork simple. Early, easy renewals reduce exposure to vacancy and keep average tenancies moving past the 18‑month mark.

‍

4. Respond as you would to issues in your own home

Quick, professional handling of maintenance requests builds trust and goodwill. Residents who feel heard and valued are far less likely to start looking elsewhere. Publish service standards, for example 24 hours for non‑urgent responses and same‑day acknowledgement for all work orders, and then meet them. Reliability earns renewals.

‍

5. Maintain high property standards

Regular upkeep and preventative maintenance show that the property is well cared for. Clean, attractive surroundings make residents proud to live there and more reluctant to leave. Small aesthetic improvements matter as well. Exterior paint, upgraded entry lighting, and tidy landscaping reinforce the value of staying.

‍

6. Foster a sense of community

Organizing occasional events, improving shared spaces, or even maintaining a friendly, familiar presence on-site can help residents feel connected. A strong community atmosphere can be a powerful retention tool. Even simple and low cost initiatives, like a seasonal newsletter or an informal resident meet-up, can help transform the perception of a property from “just a rental” to “home.”

The Bottom Line on Resident Quality

The case for prioritizing resident quality is clear: better residents means more cash flow, higher asset value, and stronger community. In a competitive rental market, landlords who focus on retaining great residents enjoy a tangible financial edge, as well as a property that’s easier to manage.

‍

In an industry where profit margins can disappear quickly with just a few vacant units or high turnover rates, the decision to invest in resident retention is both a defensive and offensive strategy. It guards against avoidable losses while positioning the property for sustained growth. Whether through more rigorous screening, better property management, or community-building efforts, the return on investing in resident quality is measured not just in dollars saved, but in the long-term resilience and value of the asset. The path to beating the 18‑month average is straightforward, if not always easy. Do these things consistently, and you’ll see average stays lengthen, costs fall, and your assets performing like a compounding investment rather than a revolving door.

‍